Previous post:

Next post:

UPDATED: ACM Graphic: Understanding nuclear power

Monday, 21 March 2011 13:32 pm · 10 comments

by Simon

Seems to be summed up thus:

Confusion reigns

UPDATE: The Sydney Morning Herald beat me to the link between these events:

"Sixty years ago, my father was in the Royal Australian Navy. The ships he sailed on took him to the Korean War and to Japan, when Australia was part of the occupation force after the bombs ended the war in the Pacific.

He saw what was left of Hiroshima after nuclear power was rained upon it. My father remembers the flattened countryside. When he reads some commentators say that the nuclear threat to Japan and beyond from the stricken reactors is a media beat-up, he gets annoyed. He has seen nuclear power in its destructive guise. To downgrade its threat - even in peacetime - is to him idiocy." (source)

Possibly related posts:

{ 10 comments }

Dave N March 21, 2011 at 3:09 pm

I can see where the idiocy is.. it’s at the SMH

SOYLENT GREEN March 21, 2011 at 3:30 pm

Current rate of emission 1 uSV / hour. That’s twice as much as standing next to someone.
See the chart below from C3 Headlines, who’ve done yeoman’s work dispelling the Nuclear Apocalypse drummed up by the Mad Max Media.

http://c3headlines.typepad.com/.a/6a010536b58035970c014e5ffd5825970c-pi

Laurie Williams March 21, 2011 at 6:31 pm

Brown is the result of mixing red and green.

If I referred to Julia as Mrs Brown would people understand the historical significance?

Eloi March 21, 2011 at 6:54 pm

Big call, that one.
People would need to understand a bit of history.
History is a big no-no in a post-carbon world.

Eloi March 21, 2011 at 6:55 pm

…and it does bring the gorge up a bit to think of Bob Brown in regal terms…

Eloi March 22, 2011 at 6:24 am

..on second thoughts, that would make Brown “the Queen”, so maybe it would work after all. Who gets to be on top, I wonder?

Eloi March 21, 2011 at 6:53 pm

Yeah — well — they both end in “SHIMA”.
Where’s the problem?
In a post-carbon world, that’s a smart as you need to be.

anon March 22, 2011 at 2:15 am

Somehow the hippies never figured out that the military will make bombs regardless of whether there are power plants. DERP DERP DERP

Peter A. March 23, 2011 at 12:10 pm

The two technologies (nuclear power and nuclear weapons) are about as different from each other as any two technologies can possibly get.

To equate the generation of nuclear power with the destructive side-effects of nuclear weapons, is like trying to argue that a refrigerator is the same as a toaster because they both run on electricity, and so therefore my refrigerator should be able to toast bread.

Simon March 23, 2011 at 12:16 pm

I know that and you know that, but a huge proportion of the public are superstitious about “nuclear” power because it is something “scary” they don’t understand.

Comments on this entry are closed.