We reported here about how CSIRO had attempted to suppress the publication of a paper critical of the government's ETS. Unfortunately, it seems the story just won't go away:
The CSIRO is grappling with claims it is trying to censor the work of an economist who has criticised the policy at the centre of the Federal Government's response to climate change.
The researcher, Dr Clive Spash, has been told not to publish a journal article that questions the economic underpinnings of carbon trading versus other means of cutting greenhouse emissions.
Dr Spash is an ecological economist with the sustainable ecosystems division at the organisation.
He told ABC Radio's AM that he was headhunted to join the CSIRO but wonders if he has a future there if he cannot talk about the subject of his research.
It's hardly surprising, when you read the following letter from Garth Paltridge in The Australian in May last year:
I HEAR on the scientific grapevine that CSIRO’s biggest problem when providing formal advice to the federal Government on the matter of climate change is to say nothing that can be interpreted as giving aid and comfort to the army of irresponsible sceptics out there who are doubtful about the dreadful consequences of global warming.
One can only feel sorry for the Government. Where can it go these days to get unbiased advice on the issue of global warming? Its official sources are poisoned by the fear among many scientists that they may be labelled by their colleagues and by their institutions as climate-change sceptics. (source - h/t Andrew Bolt)
Read it here.
Possibly related posts (automatically generated):
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.